Skydive agents take on work for you, using the same tools your team already uses.

Talk to your agent on the web, Slack, email, iMessage, or right from your terminal. Wherever you pick up the conversation, your agent keeps the context.

Put agents to work across customer support, sales, marketing, engineering, ops, and more.

Give your agent a job. They’ll take it from there.

Make your first agent

Derek Mobley applied to more than one hundred jobs. Different companies, different industries, different hiring managers. He was rejected from every one of them.

The detail that turned that into the largest AI hiring case in the country is not the number. It is that all of those applications ran through the same piece of software. Mobley sued Workday, not the employers, arguing that the vendor's screening tools filtered him out before any of those companies made a decision. Workday's position is that its AI recruiting tools do not make hiring decisions and are built with human oversight at the center. A federal judge in Northern California has kept the claims moving through 2026, and Workday's platform is used by more than eleven thousand organizations worldwide.

Set the lawsuit aside for a second, because you do not need to know how it ends to use what it exposes. Here is the structural fact underneath it: when you send one hundred applications, you are not getting one hundred independent reads. You are getting a much smaller number of verdicts, repeated. Three vendors dominate enterprise hiring software. If forty of your targets sit on the same one, and that system's model does not like the shape of your profile, forty rejections tell you exactly as much as one did.

Almost nobody tracks their search this way. They track companies. Today is about tracking the plumbing instead, because that is where the correlation lives.

Most job search advice quietly assumes every application is a fresh coin flip. Send more, win more. That model is wrong in a specific and expensive way.

If your resume trips the same filter at every employer running the same platform, volume does not help you. It just buys you the same answer in bulk. This is why people describe hitting a wall at sixty or eighty applications with no callbacks and no explanation. The wall is real. It is usually one system, not eighty companies, and grinding out another forty applications into that same system is the most common wasted month in a modern job search.

The fix is not to apply less. It is to know which lane you are in before you decide the resume is the problem.

You can identify the system from the URL of the application page. Look at the address bar the moment you click Apply, before you fill anything in.

If it contains myworkdayjobs.com, you are in Workday. greenhouse.io or job-boards.greenhouse.io is Greenhouse. jobs.lever.co is Lever. jobs.ashbyhq.com is Ashby. icims.com is iCIMS. taleo.net or oraclecloud.com is Oracle. successfactors.com is SAP.

That is it. No tools, no guessing. Add one column to whatever you track applications in and label it "system." It costs you four seconds per application and it turns your pile of rejections into a readable dataset by about week three.

This is where Workday applicants lose the most ground, and it applies in some form across every platform on that list.

When you upload a resume, the system autofills structured fields: job titles, dates, employers, education, skills. Those parsed fields are what feed the matching logic. Workday's own product for this is called Candidate Skills Match, which scores how well an applicant's skills line up with the role. The document you spent two hours formatting is sitting in an attachment field that a model is not reading closely, if at all.

Autofill is frequently wrong. It drops a job, merges two roles, mangles a date range, or leaves the skills section nearly empty. So after every upload, scroll back through the parsed fields and repair them by hand. Especially skills. If the skills field is blank because your resume put them in a sidebar, you just submitted yourself as a candidate with no skills.

No studio. No production team. No need to figure it all out yourself.

Amaze Media Labs provides everything you need to launch a professional audio and video podcast—from strategy and recording to editing, distribution and audience growth.

Schedule a Meeting

Once you have twenty or so applications logged with that one extra column, sort by it and read down the response rate.

You are looking for a split. Twenty five applications through one platform with zero responses, alongside six through a different one that produced two screens, is not bad luck. That is a signal about a specific profile in a specific system, and it points you at a fix that no amount of rewriting your summary line would have found.

If every lane is equally dead, that is useful too. It means the problem is upstream of the software: your targeting, your level, or the roles you are picking. Different problem, different week of work. The point is that you now have a fact instead of a feeling.

Vendor concentration tracks with employer size. The largest enterprises cluster heavily on a few platforms. Mid size companies and well funded startups lean toward Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby, which generally run shorter applications and lighter automated filtering.

So if your target list is twenty five household names, you have accidentally built a portfolio with almost no diversification. Deliberately add employers in the two hundred to two thousand headcount range. You are not lowering your standards. You are buying independent reads, which is the only thing that makes volume work in the first place.

Say the data comes back ugly. Thirty applications through one platform, no responses, and the other lanes are converting fine. You have two moves and they are not the same move.

The first is mechanical. Go back into one of those applications and audit what the system actually holds on you: the parsed titles, the dates, the skills list, the screening questions you answered on autopilot. A single knockout question answered carelessly, or a years of experience field that parsed as zero, will produce exactly the pattern you are seeing. Fix it, then submit a small test batch of five and watch whether the rate moves.

The second is strategic. Stop treating that lane as your primary channel. Keep applying there, because it costs little, but move your real effort to employers whose plumbing differs and to routes that skip the front door entirely.

One caution worth saying plainly. None of this means the software is out to get you, and Mobley is an unresolved case, not a verdict. It means the system you are applying through is a variable you have been ignoring, and it is one of the few in this process you can actually observe and act on.

You have been reading your rejections as a hundred separate opinions. Check whether they were ever more than one.

You don't have to scroll every AI thread, track every new tool, or watch every demo. 

The Rundown AI breaks it all down for you — the latest AI news, tools, and tutorials in one free 5-minute email every morning. 

Trusted by 2M+ professionals at Apple, Google, and NASA.

Sign up to start learning.