In partnership with

Your Fall Glow-Up: Two Drinks for Hydrated, Plump-Looking Skin

Cooler weather can leave skin looking dull and feeling dry. Pique’s Radiant Skin Duo brings a beauty upgrade to your fall routine: two delicious daily drinks that support hydrated, plump, luminous-looking skin from within.

Start with creamy, organic Sun Goddess Matcha, packed with antioxidants that support healthy-looking skin. Then sip B·T Fountain, a refreshing beauty electrolyte combining clinically studied ceramides, hyaluronic acid and electrolytes to support hydration and a dewy glow.

The beauty benefits come with impressive clinical evidence. In a clinical trial of B·T Fountain’s ceramides, skin hydration improved 25% by day 15. By day 60, hydration improved 37%, elasticity improved 36% and wrinkle depth decreased 8.2%.
Morning matcha. Afternoon beauty hydration. An easy ritual that fits into busy fall days while supporting skin that looks smoother and feels replenished. Your favorite daily drinks become a simple skincare habit worth keeping.

Welcome to today's SCALIS CareerHack newsletter! 🚀

The scheduling link lands in your inbox. Somewhere in the instructions, or nowhere in them at all, there is an AI interviewer waiting. You already know how you feel about that.

What you probably do not know is how well that feeling is predicted by one thing: whether you currently have a job.

Use.AI surveyed 6,731 jobseekers across the UK, the US, Canada, the European Union and Latin America. Among people who were already employed, 29 percent had withdrawn from a hiring process because it involved an AI interview. Among people out of work, 14 percent. Roughly double. The specific figures moved by region, but the split showed up in every one of them.

In September we made the case that the AI round is the thinnest field in your funnel, because so many candidates quit at that gate. That still holds. Here is the correction. The people quitting are not a random half of the pool. They are disproportionately the ones who can afford to, and that changes what you should do about it.

Name which number you are before you decide anything

The 29 and the 14 are not a disagreement about technology. They are a disagreement about runway. Employed candidates spend a cheap no to buy optionality. Unemployed candidates spend a real shot to buy a paycheck. Same format, different price.

So answer one question in writing before you open the link. If this process ended today, how many other live processes would I still have? Not applications sent. Processes with a human on the other end and a scheduled next step.

Zero or one means you are in the 14 percent whether you like the label or not, and your job is to run the round well, not to litigate it. Three or more means walking is genuinely cheap, and the format becomes a legitimate data point about how the employer treats people.

The expensive mistake is importing the wrong group's attitude. Reading confident walk-away advice written by someone sitting on two offers, while you have none, is how people talk themselves out of the only live process they had.

Walkability is a thing you build, not a thing you feel

Here is the number that proves it. Among people who went through an AI interview despite their own reservations, 58 percent said they would refuse if other jobs were lined up.

Read that carefully. Their opinion of the format never changed. Their budget did. Leverage in this market is a pipeline count, not a mindset, and nobody talks themselves into it.

So track one number weekly: live processes past first human contact. Three is the floor where you get to have standards. When you drop to one, stop evaluating employers entirely and spend that week adding processes instead. Your standards come back when the count comes back, and not one day sooner.

If you cannot walk, stop auditioning and start preparing

The composition shift is the part nobody has told you. If the candidates with alternatives are exiting at twice the rate, the pool being scored alongside you has quietly sorted toward people doing this under pressure.

In practice a lot of those submissions get recorded same day, on a phone, between other obligations. The median entry in that round is rushed, which makes ordinary preparation worth more here than anywhere else in the funnel.

Do the boring things almost nobody does. Write your four or five core stories out before you start. Record one throwaway practice take. Sit at a desk with a plain wall behind you and test your audio first. Use the full time allowance per question instead of racing to finish. Answer the question that was actually asked, and put one concrete number in every answer.

You cannot price a decision you cannot see

All of this assumes you knew what you were walking into. Often you did not. Greenhouse's 2026 research found that one in five jobseekers only discovered AI was involved once the interview had already started.

That is what makes the split so costly on both sides. The employed candidate who would have declined cannot decline something nobody disclosed. The unemployed candidate who needed to prepare for a scored, recorded format spent the morning preparing for a conversation.

The fix costs you one message at the scheduling step, before you pick a slot. Asking does not make you difficult. It makes you a candidate who reads the process.

Sales Owns Retention, Not Just Closed Deals

Pebl’s Chief Business Officer, Dutta Satadip, joins The GTM Garage to show how Pebl merged Operations and GTM under one leader, and how it aligned goals and incentives across the customer lifecycle.

You’ll also see how Pebl uses AI across that lifecycle and the stack behind prospecting, pipeline, and handoff to onboarding.

15 min conversation. 15 min open Q&A. For Seed to Series A teams.

Ask for the human route in the employer's language

Most candidates who want a live interview either never ask, or ask as a personal preference. Phrased as comfort, it reads as a complaint, and recruiters have a reflex answer for those.

Phrase it as a process question and it lands differently. The managing director of the firm behind this survey made the argument for you: employers work hard to check whether their screening tools judge candidates fairly, and they should care just as much about who decides to enter those tools at all. Offering a live alternative is how a company finds out whether its format is quietly filtering its own pool.

You do not need to say any of that out loud. You just need to ask in a way that costs them nothing to say yes to.

The two lines that do the work

Send the first one before you book. Send the second only if you want the live option and you have read the room.

❝

"Happy to get this booked. Before I do, could you tell me the format for this round, whether it is live or recorded, and whether someone on the team reviews the result?"

❝

"If there is a live option for this round, I would prefer it. I come across better in a conversation, and I will take the first available slot to keep it easy on your end."

Notice what the second one does. It names a preference, gives a reason that is about performance rather than principle, and removes the scheduling friction that makes recruiters say no. That is the whole trick.

Half the field is still quitting at this gate. Now you know which half, and why. Decide on purpose instead of on reflex, and make sure the decision is actually yours to make.

$1,000 in Nvidia Became $132,000. Analysts Eye 5 More

Most people heard about Nvidia and never bought a share. Now analysts have flagged five smaller AI suppliers with price targets as high as 55%. We'll text you all five tickers free, plus alerts on the next setup. Normally $19.99, free today.

Follow SCALIS on social to stay updated with early career opportunities and exciting new trends!