With Skydive, you can build a team of AI agents to take work off your plate.

Create agents for customer support, sales, marketing, engineering, ops, and more. Give each one a role, connect the tools they need, and hand off the work.

Your agents can work on their own or together, sharing context and handing off tasks to get bigger jobs done.

Start with one agent. Build a whole team around you.

Make your first agent

The email says your first interview is ready whenever you are. Twenty minutes, no scheduling back and forth, do it tonight if you want. You have done one of these. A question appears, a timer runs, you talk at a camera, you hope.

So you sit up straight, put energy in your voice, and deliver the answer you polished over four months of searching. Then it asks a follow-up. A specific one, about the number you just used.

That is not the format you prepared for. The AI screen quietly stopped being a recording booth and became a conversation, and nobody sent applicants a memo.

Here is the shape of it. Greenhouse acquired Ezra AI Labs and shipped a two-way voice interview that runs on questions and scoring criteria the hiring team defines before you click the link, generates follow-ups live, and sends the recruiter a written evaluation with rationale. It is selling into Greenhouse and Ashby today, with Lever named as next. Their own survey of 2,950 jobseekers across five countries puts the share of US jobseekers who have already sat through an AI interview at 63 percent. Six months earlier, this was a pilot.

Now the sentence that should change how you prepare. Greenhouse states publicly that interview scores are not influenced by accent, tone, fluency, pace, personality or confidence.

Read that again as a list of every instinct you bring into an interview. None of it is being measured. Today is about what is.

Two formats are live and they reward opposite behavior. A one-way recorded screen gives you a fixed question, a timer, and one take. A two-way voice interview holds a conversation, asks unscripted follow-ups, and lets you ask things back.

The invitation usually tells you. "Record your response" is one machine. "Conversation" is the other. If a practice round is offered, take it, because that is where you learn the format instead of learning it live.

If the email says nothing, reply and ask.

That is a scheduling question, not a challenge. Nobody gets penalized for asking it.

Take the vendor claim at face value and follow it where it goes. If accent, tone, pace, personality and confidence genuinely do not move the score, then warmth is unscored. So is enthusiasm. The rapport you build in the first ninety seconds of a human call, which has carried a lot of average candidates through a lot of screens, does nothing here.

What is left is content. The criteria were written by a hiring manager before you showed up, and they come down to the same handful of things: did this person do the work, at what scale, with what result, and how did they decide.

So answer in those terms. Not "I led our reporting overhaul and it went really well." Instead: "I owned reporting for a four person team, moved us off spreadsheets onto Looker across about five months, and cut month end close from nine days to three."

Same story. One version scores.

You can finally scale your LinkedIn outreach without bothering your team. Aimfox lets you add dedicated LinkedIn profiles that start conversations and route interested replies to your existing sales team.

See Aimfox Avatars

In a recorded screen, a thin answer just sits there and the timer runs out. In a two-way system it triggers a probe, because generating that probe is the entire point of the format.

So stop rehearsing answers and start stress testing them. Take your six core stories and write down the number, the timeline, the team size, what went wrong, and the call you personally made. Then have a friend or a chatbot ask "can you be more specific" three times in a row on each one and watch where you run out of material.

That empty spot is where the follow-up lands. People who struggle in this format are rarely unqualified. Their stories were just built to survive one question.

Nearly all of these run on your schedule, which is a real edge almost nobody uses.

You are choosing the time of day, the room, and which version of yourself shows up. So do not do it at eleven at night because the email made you anxious. Pick the hour you think clearly. Sit somewhere quiet with a solid connection, because your answer is only as good as your audio. Keep your resume and the posting open, since nobody is across the table to be impressed that you memorized it.

Then warm your voice up. Talk out loud for five minutes first. The opening ninety seconds of a cold voice is usually your worst, and in this format no friendly human is absorbing it for you.

The conversational part is not decoration. These systems answer candidate questions using responses the employer loaded in advance, which makes the AI screen a weirdly good place to ask what feels pushy with a recruiter.

Ask what the team owns. Ask why the role is open. Ask what the first six months should produce. You will either get a straight answer that helps you decide, or nothing, and a company that ran a first round without loading any answers has told you how much thought went into the rest of it.

In that same survey, 38 percent of US candidates said they had already withdrawn from a process because it included an AI interview, and another 12 percent said they would if one were required. A lot of that is people deciding at nine at night with a link about to expire.

Decide earlier, and decide by format. My honest read: a two-way conversation scored against a written rubric beats the resume screen it replaced, and it beats it badly if your resume is the weakest part of your candidacy. If you changed careers, took time out, went to a school nobody weights, or carry a title that undersells the work, paper was never going to carry you. Fifteen minutes of talking is a friendlier instrument.

The formats worth refusing are narrower than the whole category: one-way recorded video scored with no human in the loop, and anything monitoring your screen or eyes while you speak. Those were the top two reasons people in the survey walked.

You can also ask for something else. Forty six percent of candidates said they want the option of a human interview instead. Very few ask.

Of the US candidates who completed an AI interview, 51 percent never received an outcome. Not a rejection. Nothing.

So do not treat finishing one as progress. Log it, set a reminder, keep every other process alive, and assume silence is the default. The machine that invited you is very good at starting conversations and, for now, bad at ending them.

The tool your team adopts next quarter is in today's issue. TLDR AI is curated by Anthropic and ex-Google engineers and read by 1.1M+ people who like being first. Free, daily.

Subscribe for free