For decades, the most powerful intelligence lived behind the closed doors of quant firms — billion-dollar funds whose algorithms quietly out-traded everyone else.

That era just ended.

Co-Invest by Liquid is the first way to trade directly inside Claude and ChatGPT. Ask your AI to analyze a market, stress-test an idea, or build a position sized to your comfort level, then execute, right there in the conversation. No jargon. No twelve-screen terminal. No guesswork.

It's built for people who want to invest smarter, not gamble harder. You set the risk tolerance. The AI does the heavy lifting. You approve every trade.

The institutions made the game, Co-Invest gives you a way to beat them.

Trade with Co-Invest Today

The security firm Pindrop posted one developer opening and decided to actually audit what came back. Out of 827 applications, roughly one in eight came from someone using a fake identity. About a hundred people who did not exist. Pindrop caught them because catching fraud is literally their business. Almost no hiring team on earth would have.

That is the number to sit with, because it reframes what you are actually up against. You have been told the problem is competition: too many qualified people chasing too few roles. That is real. But there is a second thing happening underneath it, and nobody is explaining it to candidates. A meaningful slice of the pile you are applying into is not competition at all. It is noise generated by fraud operations, proxy interview rings, credential fabricators, and people running four remote salaries at once by outsourcing the work.

Gartner projects that by 2028, one in four candidate profiles worldwide could be fake. In a Greenhouse survey of roughly 4,100 people in hiring, 31 percent said they had personally interviewed someone they suspected or confirmed was using deepfake technology. Recruiters read that research too. So they adapted, and here is the part that lands on you: they stopped trusting the inbound channel. Not you specifically. The channel. Every open application now arrives carrying a question that used to be settled before anyone opened it, which is whether there is a real, single, findable human behind it.

Remote roles get the worst of this, because that is where the fraud concentrates and where a recruiter has nothing but pixels to go on. If you are applying to remote work in 2026, you are applying into the most suspicious pile in hiring. Today is about how a real person gets read anyway.

Here is what shifted mechanically. Screening used to ask "is this person good enough," and identity got settled later, at the background check. Now authenticity is the first filter and fit is the second. Some teams verify at application. Others front-load a live round specifically to see a face early.

The knock-on effect is the thing that actually costs you. When trust in the open pile collapses, recruiters shift weight toward channels where provenance is already established: referrals, sourced candidates, alumni networks, people who came recommended. Not because those candidates are better, but because their existence is not in question. The open application did not just get more crowded. It got structurally demoted.

You cannot fix that market-wide. You can stop treating the open application as your primary channel and start treating it as one of three, alongside anything that arrives with a human attached to it.

This is the most concrete and least known move on the list. Greenhouse, one of the most widely deployed applicant tracking systems, now runs identity verification through CLEAR inside its Real Talent product. Candidates verify with a selfie and ID check in the MyGreenhouse portal, and per Greenhouse's own documentation, recruiters can then search and filter their pipeline by verified status.

Read that last part again. Verified status is a filter. In a pile of 800, being flagged as a confirmed human is a sorting advantage, and it costs you about two minutes.

You usually cannot self-initiate this, since the employer triggers the request and has to have the feature switched on. So the move is readiness. When a verification email arrives, complete it that day rather than letting it sit looking like avoidance. If you already have a CLEAR account, verification is close to instant. If you do not, the one-time setup carries forward to every future request. Treat a verification prompt as a green light, not an insult.

Fake profiles are usually flawless on the page. What they cannot manufacture is corroboration that lives outside their own control. That is the real tell, and it is the standard you should be building toward.

Ask yourself what proof of you exists that you did not write. A former manager who will actually answer the phone. A company directory or press release with your name on it. A conference program. A repository with years of commit history. A byline, a patent, a public case study, a professional license number. One or two of those anchors do more for you right now than another round of resume polish.

So surface them. Put the license number on the resume. Link the repo, not the portfolio site you built last week. Name the specific team and the specific manager, not just the company. Specificity that can be checked is the signal. Vagueness that cannot be checked is what fraud looks like.

The best HR advice comes from those in the trenches. That’s what this is: real-world HR insights delivered in a newsletter from Hebba Youssef, a Chief People Officer who’s been there. Practical, real strategies with a dash of humor. Because HR shouldn’t be thankless—and you shouldn’t be alone in it.

Sign Up Free

This one stings, and almost nobody knows it. Fraud detection inside modern applicant tracking systems flags things like mismatched location and IP address, invalid or throwaway contact info, and unusual network activity. Organizations can blocklist entire email domains and IP ranges for spam.

Now look at how a lot of honest people job hunt: dozens of near identical applications fired in a burst, a throwaway email address for job stuff, a VPN running, a Google Voice number that does not match anything else. Every one of those is also what a fraud operation looks like from the system side.

Clean it up. Use your real number and let it match what is on your LinkedIn. Use a normal email on a mainstream domain, ideally with your actual name in it. Turn the VPN off when you apply. Keep your name spelled identically across resume, profile, and form fields. None of this makes you more qualified. All of it keeps you out of a bucket you do not belong in.

Employers pulled live and in person rounds back into the process specifically as a fraud gate, and remote roles get the most of it. Candidates find this annoying. That annoyance is your opening.

Being immediately, cheerfully available for a live conversation is now a trust signal, because it is the single thing a fraudulent applicant is most reluctant to do. Offer it before you are asked. If you are applying remote and can reasonably get to an office, say so unprompted.

Drop something like this into your first recruiter reply. It does provenance work without ever mentioning fraud:

Three signals in four lines: available live, references who exist and are reachable now, verification is welcome. A fraudulent candidate cannot send that message. That is exactly why it works.

The pipeline got polluted by people who are not real. The counter is not to shout louder. It is to be conspicuously, checkably, boringly verifiable.

If you're a high earner, small tax moves add up fast. On August 6, join Range's CFPs and CPAs live as they break down the tax-smart investing strategies that help you keep more of what you earn — with an open Q&A. Free to attend.

Save your spot now

^{This webinar is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Range defines "high earners" as households with income over $300k.}